Why this matters
Many PACES candidates know the medicine but lose marks through conversational errors: poor signposting, late summaries, weak closings, and findings that never get integrated into the discussion.
What to focus on
- Notice where your consultation flow becomes examiner-facing instead of patient-facing.
- Practise safer openings and stronger closing summaries.
- Review whether your requested findings actually change what you say next.
How TalkingCases fits this topic
TalkingCases is designed for the voice-compatible parts of PACES23: communication encounters and consultation encounters where you request findings and then use them in real-time reasoning.
Scope note: TalkingCases supports PACES23 consultation and communication preparation, but it does not replace standalone physical examination practice.
Suggested next reads
- MRCP PACES Practice With AI Patients
- MRCP PACES Practice Online: How To Use AI Patients For PACES23 Preparation
- MRCP PACES Consultation Station Guide: Safer Structure For Stations 2 And 5
Create a free TalkingCases account
Open TalkingCases and start practising with AI patients.
Continue →
Join the Discussion
Share your thoughts and insights with the medical community
Comments
Delete Comment
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This action cannot be undone.